The intrigue of Chauncey Wright lies with his distinction between many other great intellectuals of the late 19th century. Unlike Agassiz, Wright failed desperately as a lecturer; unlike William James, Wright published few notable articles in his lifetime, contributing only to the North American Review and Nation on a consistent basis; and unlike his other married and healthy philosophical friends, Wright died at a very young age due to a stroke perhaps related to his zealous drinking and smoking habits. However, Wright’s influence on more recognized intellectuals like William James and C.S. Peirce demonstrate the uniqueness of his voice and the strength of his intellect.
In the article, “Chauncey Wright: Forgotten American Philosopher,” Edward Madden illustrates Wright’s influence on his arguments concerning empiricism, psychology, and philosophy. Madden believes, as I do, that Wright’s thoughts should be valued in a more positive light, for his greatness in thought is irrefutable.
In the article, “Chauncey Wright: Forgotten American Philosopher,” Edward Madden illustrates Wright’s influence on his arguments concerning empiricism, psychology, and philosophy. Madden believes, as I do, that Wright’s thoughts should be valued in a more positive light, for his greatness in thought is irrefutable.
Not only was this post very well written, but its point was very well made. The origins of pragmatism are sketchy at best. The credit goes largely to William James, though, as we've mentioned in class, much of the philosophy was dreamt up by Charles Peirce. Given the trend of misattribution, its not surprising that Chauncey Wright's contributions predate those of either "founding" pragmatists.
ReplyDelete